header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 20 January 2023

20 January 2023
Issue: 8009 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings

Re HH (a child) (contact order: stay of order pending appeal) [2022] EWHC 3369 (Fam), [2023] All ER (D) 05 (Jan)

The Family Division granted the appellant mother an interim stay of a contact order which had been granted to the father in circumstances where the mother’s challenge on the findings of fact and on procedural unfairness during the hearing were pending permission to appeal (PTA). The court so ruled on the basis that it was satisfied that: (i) the mother’s grounds of appeal were not fanciful; and (ii) if an interim stay was not awarded, the viability of the mother’s appeal would be extinguished. That criteria had to be met for the appeal court to award an interim stay pending the decision on PTA on the basis that the court should be focusing on whether the refusal of such an interim stay would stifle the proposed appeal or render it nugatory. Further, in such circumstances, it should not be seen as being of the same character as a full

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll