header-logo header-logo

20 October 2023
Issue: 8045 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 20 October 2023

Conflict of laws

Zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn v De Borbón Y Borbón [2023] EWHC 2478 (KB), [2023] All ER (D) 45 (Oct)

The King’s Bench Division ruled, among other things, that the High Court of England and Wales lacked jurisdiction to try the claimant’s claim against the former King of Spain, alleging harassment. The claimant was a Danish national and a long-term resident of Monaco. She also had a home in England. The parties had had an intimate relationship, which had came to public attention. In allowing the defendant’s jurisdictional challenge, the court held that: (i) the claim had not been brought against him in his country of domicile (Spain), as was his default entitlement; (ii) the claimant did not have a good arguable case that her claim fell within an exception to that default rule, because she had not sufficiently established that the ‘harmful event’ (harassment by the defendant) had happened in England; and (iii) the defendant had not, or should not be deemed to have, submitted to the jurisdiction of the High

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll