header-logo header-logo

22 September 2023
Issue: 8041 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 22 September 2023

Criminal law

BHQ v R [2023] EWCA Crim 1018, [2023] All ER (D) 25 (Sep)

The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, ruled that it had jurisdiction to deal with a ruling made in a pre-trial preparatory hearing pursuant to s 29 of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (CPIA 1996), concerning the question of abuse of process. The court so ruled in circumstances where the Registrar of Criminal Appeals had referred the defendant’s application for permission to appeal to the full court, and where the question had been whether a ruling on an application for a stay for abuse of process was one concerning ‘any other question of law relating to the case’, within the meaning of s 31(3), CPIA 1996. The court held that appeals from rulings in preparatory hearings were in respect of questions of law, the resolution of which commonly involved making findings of fact or required the judge to make evaluative assessments. On the facts, the defendant’s application for leave to appeal against the judge’s ruling was dismissed.


Defamation

Wright

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll