header-logo header-logo

26 June 2026
Issue: 8167 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 26 June 2026

Costs

Evans v Fletchers Solicitors Ltd [2026] EWHC 1523 (SCCO)

The Senior Courts Costs Office allowed the claimant’s challenge to the success fee charged by the defendant solicitors in a costs assessment under s 70, Solicitors Act 1974. The claimant had instructed the defendant to represent him in a personal injury claim arising from a road traffic accident in 2017, which settled for £250,000 in 2021. The defendant rendered a bill including a success fee of £30,365.13 under a conditional fee agreement (CFA). The central issue was whether the case should have been funded by the claimant’s existing before-the-event (BTE) legal expenses insurance rather than a CFA. The court found, among other things, that the defendant’s enquiries into alternative funding were unreasonable, having made no enquiries for over two years after the accident and failing to contact the legal expenses insurer directly. The court held that on the balance of probabilities, BTE insurance was available through the claimant’s Zurich home insurance policy, managed by DAS Legal Expenses Insurance Company Ltd, which covered

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll