header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 28 March 2025

28 March 2025
Issue: 8110 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

Captivatiun Ltd v Orr Litchfield Solicitors Ltd [2025] Lexis Citation 615

This was a costs judgment before the Senior Courts Costs Office in Part 8 proceedings where the court dismissed the claimant’s application for a detailed assessment of the defendant solicitor’s fees under the Solicitors Act 1974. The key finding was that the claimant failed to establish ‘special circumstances’ that would justify allowing the assessment due to being significantly out of time, and that the claimant’s use of Part 8 in this particular case was an abuse of process.


Wagner v Bright Station Ventures Management Ltd [2025] EWHC 669 (KB)

This was a consequential hearing before the King’s Bench Division, following a substantive judgment in a case between Mr Wagner (the claimant) and Bright Station Ventures Management Ltd (BSVM) (the defendant). The case involved the calculation of the net sum due between the parties and the appropriate order on costs after Mr Wagner’s claims against BSVM succeeded in part and BSVM’s counterclaim largely failed. The court found that: (i) the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll