header-logo header-logo

29 July 2022
Issue: 7989 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 29 July 2022

Immigration

Secretary of State for the Home Department v Akter and others [2022] EWCA Civ 741, [2022] All ER (D) 80 (May)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed the Secretary of State’s appeal against a decision of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum) (UT) to allow the Bangladeshi respondent’s appeal against the appellant’s decision to refuse her art 8 European Convention on Human Rights claim for leave to remain on the basis that, in order to extend her previous Tier 4 student visa, she had provided a Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC) certificate which had been obtained by a proxy. The UT had held that the First Tier Tribunal had failed to engage with the All-Party Parliamentary Group report on the TOEIC (the APPG report). The court held that the decision in DK and RK (ETS: SSHD evidence, proof) India [2022] All ER (D) 107 (Mar), which was not inconsistent with Alam v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] All ER (D) 79 (Oct), had authoritatively addressed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll