header-logo header-logo

28 May 2020
Issue: 7888 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 29 May 2020

Income tax

Fowler v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2020] UKSC 22, [2020] All ER (D) 124 (May)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, had decided that in the deemed world introduced by s 15(2) of the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005, the taxpayer diver had been carrying on a business, and thus ‘an enterprise of a Contracting State’, within the meaning of Art 7(1) of the UK–South Africa Double Taxation Convention (the Treaty), which was not displaced by Art 14 of that Treaty. In allowing the Revenue and Customs Commissioners’ appeal against that decision, the Supreme Court held that nothing in s 15 of the 2005 Act purported to alter the settled meaning of the relevant terms of the Treaty, viewed from the perspective of UK tax law, with the result that, s 15 of that Act, understood in the light of s 6(5) of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003, charged income tax on the employment income of an employed diver, but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Senior associate joins family law team in London

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
back-to-top-scroll