header-logo header-logo

10 January 2025
Issue: 8099 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 3 & 10 January 2025

Compensation

Ali v HSF Logistics Polska Sp ZOO [2024] EWCA Civ 1479

This was an appeal regarding a claim for hire charges following a road traffic accident where the claimant’s car did not have a valid MOT certificate at the time of the accident. The court determined that the defendant’s ‘causation defence’—arguing that the claimant could not recover hire charges because the use of their car without a valid MOT certificate would have been illegal—was misconceived and effectively an application of the ex turpi causa doctrine without the required assessment of proportionality. The court held that the absence of a valid MOT certificate did not alter the fact that the claimant suffered inconvenience and a need for transport due to the defendant’s tort, which could be compensated through hire charges. The court ruled that denying hire charges based solely on the lack of a valid MOT would be a disproportionate response to the relatively minor nature of that offence.


Costs

Chaudry v AXA Insurance Plc [2024] Lexis Citation 3787

This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll