header-logo header-logo

03 July 2026
Issue: 8168 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 3 July 2026

Arbitration

CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd and others v Republic of India [2026] EWCA Civ 797

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division dismissed the appellants’ appeal against the decision that the respondent, the Republic of India, had not submitted to the adjudicative jurisdiction of the English courts by ratifying the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. The appellants sought to enforce two arbitral awards by a tribunal of the Permanent Court of Arbitration against India pursuant to a bilateral investment treaty between Mauritius and India. India claimed sovereign immunity under section 1 of the State Immunity Act 1978. The central issue was whether Article III of the New York Convention, which provides that ‘Each Contracting State shall recognize arbitral awards as binding and enforce them in accordance with the rules of procedure of the territory where the award is relied upon’, constituted a waiver of sovereign immunity and submission to jurisdiction within s 2(2) of the State Immunity Act 1978. The court held that the phrase ‘rules

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll