header-logo header-logo

30 January 2026
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 30 January 2026

Costs

Federal Republic of Nigeria v VR Global Partners LP and others [2026] EWCA Civ 25

The Court of Appeal dismissed Nigeria’s appeal against a Commercial Court judge’s decision to stay Nigeria’s application for a third-party costs order (TPCO) until after completion of detailed assessment proceedings. The case arose after Nigeria had succeeded in having arbitration awards worth US$11bn set aside for serious irregularity, with P&ID ordered to pay Nigeria’s costs. Nigeria sought a TPCO against the VR Capital group companies and its founder who had funded P&ID’s litigation, as P&ID itself had no assets to pay costs. The Court of Appeal held that the judge had provided sufficient reasons for his case management decision and had correctly applied the overriding objective in deciding that the detailed assessment should precede determination of third-party liability. The judge was entitled to conclude that there was a real question whether any further sums would be payable beyond the £20m already paid, making it potentially wasteful to proceed with the TPCO application before knowing the outcome

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll