header-logo header-logo

30 January 2026
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 30 January 2026

Costs

Federal Republic of Nigeria v VR Global Partners LP and others [2026] EWCA Civ 25

The Court of Appeal dismissed Nigeria’s appeal against a Commercial Court judge’s decision to stay Nigeria’s application for a third-party costs order (TPCO) until after completion of detailed assessment proceedings. The case arose after Nigeria had succeeded in having arbitration awards worth US$11bn set aside for serious irregularity, with P&ID ordered to pay Nigeria’s costs. Nigeria sought a TPCO against the VR Capital group companies and its founder who had funded P&ID’s litigation, as P&ID itself had no assets to pay costs. The Court of Appeal held that the judge had provided sufficient reasons for his case management decision and had correctly applied the overriding objective in deciding that the detailed assessment should precede determination of third-party liability. The judge was entitled to conclude that there was a real question whether any further sums would be payable beyond the £20m already paid, making it potentially wasteful to proceed with the TPCO application before knowing the outcome

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll