header-logo header-logo

30 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 30 May 2025

Commons

Darwall and another v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2025] UKSC 20

This is an appeal to the Supreme Court regarding whether s 10(1) of the Dartmoor Commons Act 1985 confers on the public a right to pitch tents or otherwise make camp overnight on Dartmoor Commons. The court analysed the wording of s 10(1) in its statutory context, including the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949 and the Law of Property Act 1925. The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that s 10(1), on its true construction, does confer such a right to wild camp on the Commons.


Costs

Shorts International Ltd v Google LLC [2025] EWCA Civ 653

This was an appeal to the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) from a decision dismissing a claim for trade mark infringement heard in the Business and Property Courts (Intellectual Property List) concerning the determination of the claimant’s application for a costs capping order and the defendant’s application for security for costs. The court held that the proceedings

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll