header-logo header-logo

04 April 2025
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 4 April 2025

Commission

Expert Tooling and Automation Ltd v Engie Power Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 292

This was an appeal before the Court of Appeal, Civil Division. This case concerns the liability of someone who pays commission to the agent of a third-party principal, where the circumstances of the commission are only partially disclosed to the principal (sometimes referred to as a ‘half-secret’ commission case). The claimant (Tooling) is a company carrying on business as a manufacturer of tools and related equipment and machinery. The defendant, (Engie), supplies electricity. Tooling used the services of a third-party broker (UW). Five contracts are at issue, all for the supply of electricity to Tooling’s premise. The key legal findings were: UW, the broker, owed fiduciary duties to Tooling, including a duty not to put itself in a position of conflict of interest without Tooling’s informed consent; merely disclosing the fact that commission would be paid was insufficient to obtain Tooling’s informed consent, where material details about the amount and funding of the commission were not disclosed;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll