header-logo header-logo

02 June 2021
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 4 June 2021

Claim form

Matthew and others v Sedman and others [2021] UKSC 19, [2021] All ER (D) 61 (May)

In the context of calculating a limitation period in a midnight deadline case, even if the cause of action had accrued at the very start of the day following midnight, that day was a complete undivided day, such that it should be included in the computation of the limitation period. Accordingly, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal which arose in respect of one of two court-approved schemes of arrangement, and where the issue concerned the calculation of the limitation period in respect of causes of action which had accrued at, or on the expiry of, the midnight hour at the end of Thursday 2 June 2011. The appellants, who were the current trustees in respect of a will, had appealed after the respondent former trustees had been granted summary judgment in respect of the appellants’ claim (the Welcome claim), alleging negligence and breach of trust (among other things), on the basis that that claim (issued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll