header-logo header-logo

02 June 2021
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 4 June 2021

Claim form

Matthew and others v Sedman and others [2021] UKSC 19, [2021] All ER (D) 61 (May)

In the context of calculating a limitation period in a midnight deadline case, even if the cause of action had accrued at the very start of the day following midnight, that day was a complete undivided day, such that it should be included in the computation of the limitation period. Accordingly, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal which arose in respect of one of two court-approved schemes of arrangement, and where the issue concerned the calculation of the limitation period in respect of causes of action which had accrued at, or on the expiry of, the midnight hour at the end of Thursday 2 June 2011. The appellants, who were the current trustees in respect of a will, had appealed after the respondent former trustees had been granted summary judgment in respect of the appellants’ claim (the Welcome claim), alleging negligence and breach of trust (among other things), on the basis that that claim (issued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll