header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 5 December 2025

05 December 2025
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Compulsory purchase

R (L1T FM Holdings Ltd and Letterone Core Investments Sàrl) v Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster in the Cabinet Office [2025] EWCA Civ 1528

The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against a judgment of the Administrative Court which had rejected a claim for judicial review of a ‘final order’ made under s 26(3) of the National Security and Investment Act 2021. The order required the appellant to divest its 100% shareholding in Upp Corporation Ltd, a fibre broadband start-up company, due to national security risks arising from the ultimate beneficial ownership of the LetterOne Group by certain Russian nationals creating vulnerability to leverage by the Russian state. The appellants argued that they suffered financial loss because they could not obtain fair market value in the forced sale and that Art 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights required compensation beyond what they obtained from the sale. The court held that the principle of proportionality was satisfied without additional compensation, as the appellants were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

Firm elects new senior partner to lead next phase of growth

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Partner appointed head of family and divorce

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Financial and professional risks team expand with dual partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll