header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 6 June 2025

06 June 2025
Issue: 8119 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Child welfare

A Local Authority v X and others [2025] EWFC 126

The Family Court ruled on a case involving the anonymisation of parents’ names in published judgments related to care proceedings, where findings of child abuse were made against the parents. The court had to recognise the extraordinarily difficult balancing exercise between Article 8 (right to privacy) and Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The court had concluded that the Article 8 rights of the children should prevail, that those rights justified interference in the Article 10 rights, and such interference was proportionate in the particular and unusual circumstances of the case.


Competition

Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and others v Lundbeck Ltd and others [2025] EWCA Civ 677

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal by the appellant pharmaceutical companies against the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s (CAT’s) decision that the respondents’ (NHS bodies) follow-on claim under s 47A of the Competition Act 1998 was not time-barred. The respondents claimed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll