header-logo header-logo

08 October 2021
Issue: 7951 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 8 October 2021

Abuse

Blackpool Football Club Ltd v DSN [2021] EWCA Civ 1352, [2021] All ER (D) 33 (Sep)

The appellant football club, Blackpool FC, appealed against a decision that it was vicariously liable for the acts of FR, a talent scout, when he had sexually abused the respondent, DSN, then aged 13, while on a trip to New Zealand organised by FR in 1987 (see [2020] All ER (D) 92 (Mar)). The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in allowing the appeal on the vicarious liability grounds, held, among other things, that: (i) the evidence as identified by the judge had not justified a finding that the relationship between Blackpool FC and FR was one that could properly be treated as akin to employment. However, on the limitation grounds concerning the disapplication of the applicable primary limitation period pursuant to s 33 of the Limitation Act 1980, the court held that the judge had been entitled to conclude that no real risk of substantial or significant prejudice had been caused to Blackpool FC

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll