header-logo header-logo

08 October 2021
Issue: 7951 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 8 October 2021

Abuse

Blackpool Football Club Ltd v DSN [2021] EWCA Civ 1352, [2021] All ER (D) 33 (Sep)

The appellant football club, Blackpool FC, appealed against a decision that it was vicariously liable for the acts of FR, a talent scout, when he had sexually abused the respondent, DSN, then aged 13, while on a trip to New Zealand organised by FR in 1987 (see [2020] All ER (D) 92 (Mar)). The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in allowing the appeal on the vicarious liability grounds, held, among other things, that: (i) the evidence as identified by the judge had not justified a finding that the relationship between Blackpool FC and FR was one that could properly be treated as akin to employment. However, on the limitation grounds concerning the disapplication of the applicable primary limitation period pursuant to s 33 of the Limitation Act 1980, the court held that the judge had been entitled to conclude that no real risk of substantial or significant prejudice had been caused to Blackpool FC

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll