header-logo header-logo

09 May 2025
Issue: 8115 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 9 May 2025

Appeal

R v Perry [2025] UKSC 17

This is an appeal to the Supreme Court in a criminal case from Northern Ireland. The certified question is whether the interpretation of a defence statement is a question of law for the trial judge. That would depend on the nature of the statement made in the defence statement and the purpose for which it is being relied upon. The key legal finding is that the interpretation of a paragraph in the appellant's defence statement raises a question of fact, not law, for the trial judge. The concurrent factual findings of the trial judge and Court of Appeal that the appellant lacked credibility should not be disturbed absent a misdirection or perverse conclusion.


Barrister

Taylor v The Bar Standards Board [2025] EWHC 1029 (Admin)

The Administrative Court allowed the appellant barrister’s statutory appeal pursuant to s 24 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 against a sanction imposed by a disciplinary panel of the Bar Tribunals and Adjudication Service. The appellant barrister

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll