header-logo header-logo

09 May 2025
Issue: 8115 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 9 May 2025

Appeal

R v Perry [2025] UKSC 17

This is an appeal to the Supreme Court in a criminal case from Northern Ireland. The certified question is whether the interpretation of a defence statement is a question of law for the trial judge. That would depend on the nature of the statement made in the defence statement and the purpose for which it is being relied upon. The key legal finding is that the interpretation of a paragraph in the appellant's defence statement raises a question of fact, not law, for the trial judge. The concurrent factual findings of the trial judge and Court of Appeal that the appellant lacked credibility should not be disturbed absent a misdirection or perverse conclusion.


Barrister

Taylor v The Bar Standards Board [2025] EWHC 1029 (Admin)

The Administrative Court allowed the appellant barrister’s statutory appeal pursuant to s 24 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 against a sanction imposed by a disciplinary panel of the Bar Tribunals and Adjudication Service. The appellant barrister

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll