Is the law a fat ass?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.

22 February 2007 / Kelly Banham

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Opinion , Family , Human rights

printer

mail-detail

Kelly Banham considers whether parents should be prosecuted for allowing their children to become obese

In a recent case, two brothers from Fordham have been convicted of animal cruelty under the Protection of Animals Act 2000 in a private prosecution brought by the RSPCA (unreported, 12 January 2007). David Benton and his brother Derek allowed their pet Labrador, Rusty, to become dangerously obese, weighing in at over 11 stone. Vets are reported to have compared the appearance of the nine-year-old dog to a walrus.

In one of the first cases of its kind, Ely Magistrates’ Court heard evidence from the prosecution that the brothers had ignored veterinary advice and had failed to provide an appropriate diet for the dog, which on examination by an RSPCA inspector could “barely walk a few steps and collapsed if kept standing”. The brothers denied mistreatment but were found guilty and each given a three-year conditional discharge and ordered to pay £250 in costs. The dog has since been returned into their care.

Precedent has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Is the law a fat ass?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.

Kelly Banham considers whether parents should be prosecuted for allowing their children to become obese

In a recent case, two brothers from Fordham have been convicted of animal cruelty under the Protection of Animals Act 2000 in a private prosecution brought by the RSPCA (unreported, 12 January 2007). David Benton and his brother Derek allowed their pet Labrador, Rusty, to become dangerously obese, weighing in at over 11 stone. Vets are reported to have compared the appearance of the nine-year-old dog to a walrus.

In one of the first cases of its kind, Ely Magistrates’ Court heard evidence from the prosecution that the brothers had ignored veterinary advice and had failed to provide an appropriate diet for the dog, which on examination by an RSPCA inspector could “barely walk a few steps and collapsed if kept standing”. The brothers denied mistreatment but were found guilty and each given a three-year conditional discharge and ordered to pay £250 in costs. The dog has since been returned into their care.

Precedent has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

Francis Ho, Charles Russell Speechlys partner, was recently appointed chair of the Construction Law Committee of the City of London Law Society. He discusses the challenges of learning to lead, the importance of professional ethics, and the power of the written word, withNLJ

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

NEWS

NLJ this week: Motor commissions & fiduciary duties

The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings

NLJ this week: The power of Interpol red notices

Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur

Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?

NLJ this week: Clarity on cladding

In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022

NLJ this week: Self-disclosure risks & rewards

Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations

back-to-top-scroll