header-logo header-logo

Is the law a fat ass?

22 February 2007 / Kelly Banham
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Opinion , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Kelly Banham considers whether parents should be prosecuted for allowing their children to become obese

In a recent case, two brothers from Fordham have been convicted of animal cruelty under the Protection of Animals Act 2000 in a private prosecution brought by the RSPCA (unreported, 12 January 2007). David Benton and his brother Derek allowed their pet Labrador, Rusty, to become dangerously obese, weighing in at over 11 stone. Vets are reported to have compared the appearance of the nine-year-old dog to a walrus.

In one of the first cases of its kind, Ely Magistrates’ Court heard evidence from the prosecution that the brothers had ignored veterinary advice and had failed to provide an appropriate diet for the dog, which on examination by an RSPCA inspector could “barely walk a few steps and collapsed if kept standing”. The brothers denied mistreatment but were found guilty and each given a three-year conditional discharge and ordered to pay £250 in costs. The dog has since been returned into their care.

Precedent has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Nigel Adams & Rehman Noormohamed

Weightmans—Nigel Adams & Rehman Noormohamed

Insurance and corporate teams in London announce double partner hire

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Commercial property and corporate teams expand in Southampton

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Employment firm expands capability with experienced hire

NEWS
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
back-to-top-scroll