header-logo header-logo

02 September 2020
Issue: 7900 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Law firms,furlough & the future

Some 71% of law firms made use of the government’s furlough scheme, less than the 81% average for professions, according to independent research commissioned in July by Braemar Finance

However, the COVID-19 pandemic could impact staffing levels in the future. One in four of the 1,200 senior lawyers surveyed expect to operate with fewer staff in future, with the majority (71%) saying they’ll return with the same number. Only 2% will be employing more.

In the next year, 6% of lawyers expect their business to expand, 13% expect it will contract and 80% think it will ‘stay the same’. In terms of returning to full operations, lawyers are divided: nearly a third think it will take them up to three months, 37% expect it to take three to six months, and 12% expect it will take up to a year.

The firms were considering various funding options to see them through the pandemic, including payment holidays, consolidation of loans and new funding as well as government support and advice. Half of them had applied for a Coronavirus business interruption loan scheme, more than a third had applied for grants and 44% had applied for bounceback loans.

Issue: 7900 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
back-to-top-scroll