header-logo header-logo

Law firms: make the most of your knowledge

02 March 2021
Categories: Legal News , Technology , Legal services
printer mail-detail
Law firms may be behind the times when it comes to digital capabilities for knowledge work, research has found.

However, they’re not alone. A survey by tech company iManage of more than 1,000 businesses in the UK and Stateside, 38% of which work in the legal sector, found just 23% of knowledge workers (people whose job involves handling or using information) reported their organisation was ahead of the curve in digital capabilities to support knowledge work.

With ever-increasing amounts of data being produced, the collective information amassed can be difficult to manage. iManage makes the point that, where a variety of teams and projects are at work, it is important to collect the information gathered in a way that makes it accessible and easy to find.

Nearly three-quarters of respondents to the survey thought knowledge work would become more important to business in a post-Covid world, and 68% of knowledge workers believed the information contained in digital documents and files such as emails, contracts and spreadsheets is vital to their business.

More than a quarter of respondents, however, said most of their documents are scattered and siloed across multiple systems. 30% said documents reach their organisation via five or more channels.

Neil Araujo, CEO of iManage, said: ‘Really understanding how to make knowledge work achieve its highest and best use within organisations is a perspective shift that goes beyond enabling simple knowledge management.

‘It requires putting into place an ecosystem for knowledge activation. Organisations must have a breadth of capabilities at work that include collaboration, secure storage and retrieval, ability to work from anywhere, and capacity to curate and repurpose institutional knowledge―all delivered though a high-performance, reliable cloud service. 

‘This empowers knowledge workers to create opportunities for unencumbered thinking, higher level productivity, and creativity that drives innovation and spurs new business opportunities.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll