header-logo header-logo

27 April 2022
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Law firms showed resilience during pandemic

The majority of solicitors grew fee income during the pandemic, according to the Law Society’s annual Law Management Section Financial Benchmarking Survey 

Nearly 70% of the 206 respondents (with an average income of £5.3m) experienced year-on-year growth in fee income in 2020.

Median practice fee income rose by 6.2%, the largest increase for seven years, while median fee income per equity partner rose 8.3% from £761,981 in 2020 to £825,331 in 2021.

Total salary costs as a percentage of fee income fell by 2.9%. The saving may be attributed to staff being furloughed during the pandemic, delays in pay reviews and promotions and fee earners’ fees rising more than the increase in salaries.

Equity partners fared well, with median net profit per equity partner rising by 39%. This could be due to increased fee income particularly in residential conveyancing and employment combined with reductions in staff and overhead costs such as heating and lighting. The median spend on non-salary costs (such as premises, marketing and recruitment) reduced by 2.2%.

Many of the firms took part in COVID-19 support schemes, with 83% furloughing at least some of their staff and 13% making use of local authority grants to receive an average £27,000. Three-quarters of respondents borrowed money through the Bounce Back Loan Scheme or Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme.

Nearly four out of five of the firms deferred their VAT payments, while 12% deferred or spread the PAYE/NIC due on monthly salaries and 44% of self-employed sole practitioners or partners in partnership/LLP firms deferred their tax. Among respondents who were limited companies, 12% negotiated time to repay their corporation tax bills.

Law Society vice president Lubna Shuja said: ‘Solicitor firms have demonstrated their resilience through 2020/21, using lifelines from government to retain staff and equipping them to support clients from outside traditional office environments.’ 
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll