header-logo header-logo

Law & politics: a two-pronged attack?

02 December 2022 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 8005 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights , EU
printer mail-detail
102826
The ongoing assault on the judiciary, the European Convention on Human Rights & the Human Rights Act is authoritarian & undemocratic, says Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, in his first public statement, committed his government to implementing the Conservative Party’s 2019 manifesto, listing several of its promises but omitting any reference to those affecting our legal system. Under the heading ‘Protect our democracy’, the manifesto promises to ‘update the Human Rights Act’ and to ensure that ‘judicial review is… not abused to conduct politics by another means or to create needless delays’. It says: ‘In our first year we will set up a Constitution, Democracy and Rights Commission that will examine these issues in depth.’

This did not happen. Instead, the Johnson government created separate commissions chaired by senior lawyers—one an ex-Conservative minister Lord Faulks, the other Sir Peter Gross, a retired Lord Justice of Appeal—to examine administrative law and human rights. Both poured cold water on the government’s intentions, but the government did

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll