header-logo header-logo

28 January 2010
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Competition law—Breach of competition statute—Ex turpia causa non oritur actio

Safeway Stores Ltd v Twigger and others [2010] EWHC 11 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 90 (Jan)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court Flaux J, 15 January 2010

A breach of the Competition Act 1998 (CA 1998) is sufficiently serious to engage the principle of ex turpi causa non oritur actio.

Robert Anderson QC and Tristan Jones (instructed by Wragge & Co LLP) for the claimants. Andrew Mitchell and David Murray (instructed by CMS Cameron McKenna LLP) for the first to seventh and ninth to eleventh defendants. Thomas Sharpe QC (instructed by Clifford Chance LLP) for the eighth defendant.

The claimant companies were all companies in the Safeway group, which was sold to Morrisons in 2004. The defendants were all former employees, in some cases directors, of the claimants. It was alleged that in 2002 and 2003, the claimants engaged in the repeated direct and indirect exchange of commercially sensitive retail pricing intentions with other large supermarket and dairy processors. The office of fair trading (OFT) alleged that the claimants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll