header-logo header-logo

28 January 2010
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Competition law—Breach of competition statute—Ex turpia causa non oritur actio

Safeway Stores Ltd v Twigger and others [2010] EWHC 11 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 90 (Jan)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court Flaux J, 15 January 2010

A breach of the Competition Act 1998 (CA 1998) is sufficiently serious to engage the principle of ex turpi causa non oritur actio.

Robert Anderson QC and Tristan Jones (instructed by Wragge & Co LLP) for the claimants. Andrew Mitchell and David Murray (instructed by CMS Cameron McKenna LLP) for the first to seventh and ninth to eleventh defendants. Thomas Sharpe QC (instructed by Clifford Chance LLP) for the eighth defendant.

The claimant companies were all companies in the Safeway group, which was sold to Morrisons in 2004. The defendants were all former employees, in some cases directors, of the claimants. It was alleged that in 2002 and 2003, the claimants engaged in the repeated direct and indirect exchange of commercially sensitive retail pricing intentions with other large supermarket and dairy processors. The office of fair trading (OFT) alleged that the claimants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll