header-logo header-logo

Contempt of court- Private action against witness in litigation- Permission to bring private proceedings for contempt.

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton [2008] EWCA Civ 1280, [2008] All ER (D) 200 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Mummery, Arden and Moore-Bick LJJ, 20 Nov 2008

The court should exercise great caution before giving permission to bring private proceedings for contempt of court where it appears that a witness has made untrue statements under oath. It would have to require a strong case both that the statement in question was untrue and that the maker knew that it was untrue at the time he made it.

Iain Purvis QC and Kathryn Pickard (instructed by Robinsons) for the claimant. David Waters QC and Dean Armstrong (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the defendant.

The well-known motorcycle manufacturer, Honda Motor Co Ltd and its UK subsidiary (collectively, Honda), brought proceedings in England against the claimant in the instant case, who was a motorcycle dealer. Honda alleged infringement of its trademarks and applied for summary judgment. The claimant opposed the application. In response, Honda

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll