header-logo header-logo

Contempt of court- Private action against witness in litigation- Permission to bring private proceedings for contempt.

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton [2008] EWCA Civ 1280, [2008] All ER (D) 200 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Mummery, Arden and Moore-Bick LJJ, 20 Nov 2008

The court should exercise great caution before giving permission to bring private proceedings for contempt of court where it appears that a witness has made untrue statements under oath. It would have to require a strong case both that the statement in question was untrue and that the maker knew that it was untrue at the time he made it.

Iain Purvis QC and Kathryn Pickard (instructed by Robinsons) for the claimant. David Waters QC and Dean Armstrong (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the defendant.

The well-known motorcycle manufacturer, Honda Motor Co Ltd and its UK subsidiary (collectively, Honda), brought proceedings in England against the claimant in the instant case, who was a motorcycle dealer. Honda alleged infringement of its trademarks and applied for summary judgment. The claimant opposed the application. In response, Honda

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll