header-logo header-logo

Divorce­—Ancillary relief­—Pre-nuptial agreement

10 July 2009
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Radmacher, formerly Granatino v Granatino Sub nom NG v KR (prenuptial contract [2009] EWCA Civ 649, [2009] All ER (D) 31 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Thorpe, Rix and Wilson LJJ,
2 Jul 2009

The law remains that pre-nuptial agreements are at one and the same time both unenforceable and invalid as being against public policy and matters which the court is prepared to take into account (and possibly decisively) for the purposes of its jurisdiction under s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973).

Richard Todd QC and Geoffrey Kingscote (instructed by Ayesha Vardag) for the wife. Nicholas Mostyn QC and Deepak Nagpal (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) for the husband.

The wife, who was born in Germany to a wealthy family, came to London in the 1990s. The husband, who was of French nationality, was educated in France but was resident in England. The parties became engaged in June 1998. At the suggestion of the wife’s family, they agreed to enter into a pre-nuptial contract. The parties married in November 1998 and subsequently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll