header-logo header-logo

Divorce­—Ancillary relief­—Pre-nuptial agreement

10 July 2009
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Radmacher, formerly Granatino v Granatino Sub nom NG v KR (prenuptial contract [2009] EWCA Civ 649, [2009] All ER (D) 31 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Thorpe, Rix and Wilson LJJ,
2 Jul 2009

The law remains that pre-nuptial agreements are at one and the same time both unenforceable and invalid as being against public policy and matters which the court is prepared to take into account (and possibly decisively) for the purposes of its jurisdiction under s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973).

Richard Todd QC and Geoffrey Kingscote (instructed by Ayesha Vardag) for the wife. Nicholas Mostyn QC and Deepak Nagpal (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) for the husband.

The wife, who was born in Germany to a wealthy family, came to London in the 1990s. The husband, who was of French nationality, was educated in France but was resident in England. The parties became engaged in June 1998. At the suggestion of the wife’s family, they agreed to enter into a pre-nuptial contract. The parties married in November 1998 and subsequently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll