header-logo header-logo

Employment—Discrimination—Philosophical belief

12 November 2009
Issue: 7393 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Nicholson v Grainger plc and others [2009] All ER (D) 59 (Nov), UKEAT/0219/09/ZT

Employment Appeal Tribunal, Burton J, 3 November 2009
A belief in man-made climate change is capable of amounting to a “philosophical belief” for the purposes of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660), (EER 2003).
John Bowers QC (instructed by Grange Wintringham) for the employee. Dinah Rose QC and Ivan Hare (instructed by Bindmans LLP) for the employer.

The employee worked for the employer until July 1998 when, according to the employer, he was dismissed on the ground of redundancy. The employee brought a complaint before an employment tribunal, contending that he had been unfairly dismissed and subjected to discrimination contrary to EER 2003, due to his asserted philosophical belief about climate change and the environment.

Paragraph 3 of the Regulations provided “(1) For the purposes of these Regulations, a person (“A”) discriminates against another person (“B”) if … (a) on the grounds of the religion or belief of B … A treats B less favourably than he treats or would treat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll