header-logo header-logo

12 November 2009
Issue: 7393 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Employment—Discrimination—Philosophical belief

Nicholson v Grainger plc and others [2009] All ER (D) 59 (Nov), UKEAT/0219/09/ZT

Employment Appeal Tribunal, Burton J, 3 November 2009
A belief in man-made climate change is capable of amounting to a “philosophical belief” for the purposes of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660), (EER 2003).
John Bowers QC (instructed by Grange Wintringham) for the employee. Dinah Rose QC and Ivan Hare (instructed by Bindmans LLP) for the employer.

The employee worked for the employer until July 1998 when, according to the employer, he was dismissed on the ground of redundancy. The employee brought a complaint before an employment tribunal, contending that he had been unfairly dismissed and subjected to discrimination contrary to EER 2003, due to his asserted philosophical belief about climate change and the environment.

Paragraph 3 of the Regulations provided “(1) For the purposes of these Regulations, a person (“A”) discriminates against another person (“B”) if … (a) on the grounds of the religion or belief of B … A treats B less favourably than he treats or would treat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll