header-logo header-logo

03 December 2009
Issue: 7396 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Asylum seeker—Accommodation—Definition of “child”

R (on the application of A) v Croydon London Borough Council; R (on the application of M) v Lambeth London Borough Council [2009] UKSC 8; [2009] All ER (D) 288 (Nov)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lord Scott, Lord Walker, Lady Hale SCJJ and Lord Neuberger, 26 November 2009

The word “child”, in the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989), is defined in wholly objective terms, and the question of whether a person is a “child” is a question for the court rather than for other kinds of decision makers, to be determined on the evidence available.

John Howell QC and Ian Wise (instructed by Hartner and Loveless Solicitors) for A. Timothy Straker QC and Christopher Buttler (instructed by Bennett Wilkins Solicitors) for M. Nigel Giffin QC, Bryan McGuire and Peggy Etiebet (instructed by Democratic and Legal Services Division) for Croydon.

Charles Bear QC and Jon Holbrook (instructed by Sternberg Reed) for Lambeth. Nathalie Lieven QC and Deok Joo Rhee (instructed by the Treasury Solicitors) for the Secretary of State. Richard Drabble QC and Ranjiv Khubbler

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll