header-logo header-logo

10 December 2009
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws—Family law—Child residing outside EU

Re I (a child) (jurisdiction: habitual residence outside European Union) [2009] UKSC 10, [2009] All ER (D) 12 (Dec)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lady Hale, Lord Collins, Lord Kerr and LordClarke SCJJ,1 December 2009

The courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to determine the future level of contact between a child and his mother where the child does not habitually reside in an EU member state, pursuant to Art 12 of Council Regulation 2201/2003/EC (Brussels II Revised).

Jonathan Baker QC and Edward Devereux for the mother. Alison Russell QC and Divya Bhatia for the father. Judith Charlton for the guardian. Henry Setright QC and Teertha Gupta for Reunite International Child Abduction Centre and the Centre for Family Law and Practice intervening.

The child was born in the UK in July 2000, and was a British citizen. His mother originated from India but had lived in the UK for many years. His father originated from Pakistan. Both were British citizens.

They married in Pakistan in October 1999 and lived together in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll