header-logo header-logo

04 February 2010
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Bank-Documentary credit-Disposal statement

Fortis Bank S.A./N.V and another V Indian Overseas Bank [2010] EWHC 84 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 189 (Jan)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Hamblen J, 28 January 2010
Article 16 of the Uniform Customs Practice of Documentary Credits 600 (UCP 600) imposes an obligation on an issuing bank to act in accordance with any disposal statement it has made; a term as to reasonable promptness may be implied into Art 16.

Timothy Young QC and Malcolm Jarvis (instructed by DLA Piper UK LLP) for the claimants. Sara Cockerill (instructed by Holman Fenwick Willan LLP) for the defendant.

The first claimant was the nominated bank in respect of five letters of credit issued by the defendant bank for the benefit of the second claimant company. Subsequently the company made a number of drawings under each of the letters of credit. It presented documents to the first claimant in respect of drawings under three letters.

The first claimant honoured the documents and forwarded them to the defendant for reimbursement. The company then presented documents directly to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll