header-logo header-logo

04 February 2010
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Bank-Documentary credit-Disposal statement

Fortis Bank S.A./N.V and another V Indian Overseas Bank [2010] EWHC 84 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 189 (Jan)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Hamblen J, 28 January 2010
Article 16 of the Uniform Customs Practice of Documentary Credits 600 (UCP 600) imposes an obligation on an issuing bank to act in accordance with any disposal statement it has made; a term as to reasonable promptness may be implied into Art 16.

Timothy Young QC and Malcolm Jarvis (instructed by DLA Piper UK LLP) for the claimants. Sara Cockerill (instructed by Holman Fenwick Willan LLP) for the defendant.

The first claimant was the nominated bank in respect of five letters of credit issued by the defendant bank for the benefit of the second claimant company. Subsequently the company made a number of drawings under each of the letters of credit. It presented documents to the first claimant in respect of drawings under three letters.

The first claimant honoured the documents and forwarded them to the defendant for reimbursement. The company then presented documents directly to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll