header-logo header-logo

18 February 2010
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Costs—Assessment—Standard basis

Drew v Whitbread [2010] EWCA Civ 53, [2010] All ER (D) 104 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Waller, Hooper, Etherton LJJ and Senior Costs Judge Hurst sitting as an assessor, 9 February 2010.

Where the trial judge has in a multi-track case ordered costs to be paid on the standard basis, a costs judge may nevertheless rule that the case was in reality a fast track case and assess trial costs on a fast track basis, even if the point was not raised before the trial judge. 

Mark Friston and Craig Ralph (instructed by Messrs Harris Fowler) for the claimant. Andrew Hogarth QC and Benjamin Williams (instructed by Wansboroughs Solicitors) for the defendant.

At the conclusion of the claimant’s personal injury trial, the district judge found the defendants liable for 75% of the claimant’s injuries. On damages he awarded a total of 9,291.56, which was higher than the sum paid into court by the defendants. Costs were ordered to be assessed on the standard basis. The district judge ruled at the commencement of the assessment that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll