header-logo header-logo

18 February 2010
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Costs—Assessment—Standard basis

Drew v Whitbread [2010] EWCA Civ 53, [2010] All ER (D) 104 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Waller, Hooper, Etherton LJJ and Senior Costs Judge Hurst sitting as an assessor, 9 February 2010.

Where the trial judge has in a multi-track case ordered costs to be paid on the standard basis, a costs judge may nevertheless rule that the case was in reality a fast track case and assess trial costs on a fast track basis, even if the point was not raised before the trial judge. 

Mark Friston and Craig Ralph (instructed by Messrs Harris Fowler) for the claimant. Andrew Hogarth QC and Benjamin Williams (instructed by Wansboroughs Solicitors) for the defendant.

At the conclusion of the claimant’s personal injury trial, the district judge found the defendants liable for 75% of the claimant’s injuries. On damages he awarded a total of 9,291.56, which was higher than the sum paid into court by the defendants. Costs were ordered to be assessed on the standard basis. The district judge ruled at the commencement of the assessment that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll