header-logo header-logo

Costs—Assessment—Standard basis

18 February 2010
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Drew v Whitbread [2010] EWCA Civ 53, [2010] All ER (D) 104 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Waller, Hooper, Etherton LJJ and Senior Costs Judge Hurst sitting as an assessor, 9 February 2010.

Where the trial judge has in a multi-track case ordered costs to be paid on the standard basis, a costs judge may nevertheless rule that the case was in reality a fast track case and assess trial costs on a fast track basis, even if the point was not raised before the trial judge. 

Mark Friston and Craig Ralph (instructed by Messrs Harris Fowler) for the claimant. Andrew Hogarth QC and Benjamin Williams (instructed by Wansboroughs Solicitors) for the defendant.

At the conclusion of the claimant’s personal injury trial, the district judge found the defendants liable for 75% of the claimant’s injuries. On damages he awarded a total of 9,291.56, which was higher than the sum paid into court by the defendants. Costs were ordered to be assessed on the standard basis. The district judge ruled at the commencement of the assessment that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll