header-logo header-logo

25 February 2010
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Solicitor—Costs—Contentious business

Bilkus v Stockler Brunton (a firm)[2010] EWCA Civ 101, [2010] All ER (D) 182 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Ward, Longmore and Stanley Burnton LJJ, 16 February 2010

The Court of Appeal has given guidance on the meaning of contentious and non-contentious work for the purposes of, inter alia, the Solicitors (Non-Contentious Business) Remuneration Order 1994, SI 1994/2616 (SRO 1994).

William Stockler of Stockler Brunton for the solicitors. Tim Chelmick (instructed by HC Solicitors LLP) for the claimant.

In January 2001 the solicitors were retained by the claimant to act for him in a dispute about his interest in a company. A letter of retainer was issued which set out the basis for the firm’s charges.

Proceedings were subsequently issued by the solicitors on the claimant’s behalf. In October 2003 a judgment was issued providing, inter alia, the price for the claimant’s shares was to be determined by an independent valuer, not by the court. The valuer would act as an expert, not an arbitrator.

The solicitors continued to act in regard to the valuation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll