header-logo header-logo

25 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Human rights—Privacy—Family

AD and another v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 28680/06, [2010] All ER (D) 153 (Mar)

European Court of Human Rights, Judge Garlicki (President), Judges Bratza, Bonello, Mijovic, Sikuta, Poalelungi and Vucinic, and L Early (Section Registrar), 16 March 2010

The removal of a child from his mother on a mistaken assessment of his injuries has been held to have breached Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and the lack of a domestic remedy for the mother’s claim a breach of Art 13.

The first applicant, AD, was a UK national. The second applicant, OD, was her son, born in 1996. Following action by the local authority on the mistaken assumption OD had suffered non-accidental injuries, the applicants were separated for a period of time.

The applicants brought proceedings in negligence and personal injury, claiming to have suffered damage due to the separation. The judge held that the authority did not owe a duty of care to a parent in the context of care proceedings based on allegations of abuse. The Court of Appeal upheld

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis will mark the 80th anniversary of Shawcross and Beaumont on Air Law with a live podcast exploring the evolution of aviation law from the Chicago Convention to the challenges facing modern aerospace, taking place on Tuesday 29 September
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
Indemnity costs remain exceptional, but parties cannot ignore a case that deteriorates around them. In Lawrence v Associated Newspapers, Mr Justice Nicklin ordered the claimants to pay indemnity costs after finding their conduct, viewed cumulatively, fell ‘well outside the norm’
Public law is in flux following reversals and robust appellate intervention, according to the latest public law update by the team at HSFK for NLJ
Neurotechnology is turning the human mind into an operational domain, exposing gaps in the laws of war
back-to-top-scroll