header-logo header-logo

25 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Human rights—Privacy—Family

AD and another v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 28680/06, [2010] All ER (D) 153 (Mar)

European Court of Human Rights, Judge Garlicki (President), Judges Bratza, Bonello, Mijovic, Sikuta, Poalelungi and Vucinic, and L Early (Section Registrar), 16 March 2010

The removal of a child from his mother on a mistaken assessment of his injuries has been held to have breached Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and the lack of a domestic remedy for the mother’s claim a breach of Art 13.

The first applicant, AD, was a UK national. The second applicant, OD, was her son, born in 1996. Following action by the local authority on the mistaken assumption OD had suffered non-accidental injuries, the applicants were separated for a period of time.

The applicants brought proceedings in negligence and personal injury, claiming to have suffered damage due to the separation. The judge held that the authority did not owe a duty of care to a parent in the context of care proceedings based on allegations of abuse. The Court of Appeal upheld

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll