header-logo header-logo

15 April 2010
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Immigration—Asylum seeker—Removal from United Kingdom to state of which person not national or citizen

R (on the application of Saeedi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 705 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 16 (Apr)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court, Cranston J,
31 March 2010

The secretary of state is generally entitled under Council Regulation (EC) 3433/2003 (the Dublin Regulation) to return an asylum seeker to the member state identified under the hierarchy of criteria in its Chapter III as the member state responsible for determining the claim for asylum, subject to there being no breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) or the provisions of the Dublin Regulation itself.

Mark Henderson and Alison Pickup (instructed by Refugee and Migrant Justice) for the claimant. Elisabeth Laing QC and Alan Payne (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State. Simon Cox and Shahram Taghavi (instructed by Simons Muirhead and Burton) for the first interveners. Raza Husain QC and Samantha Knights (instructed by Baker and McKenzie LLP) for the second intervener.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll