header-logo header-logo

13 May 2010
Issue: 7417 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Disclosure—Allegation of apparent bias against judge—Party seeking disclosure of documents instructing judge when counsel

Mireskandari v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 967 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 06 (May)

Queen’s Bench Division, Eady J, 4 May 2010

There is no jurisdiction under CPR 18, CPR 31 or any other basis on which to order disclosure of documents provided to a judge when he was counsel in order to support an allegation of apparent bias against that judge arising out of the fact that he was involved in unrelated litigation at the Bar involving one of the parties.

David Oliver QC and Colin Challenger (instructed by J Tehrani) for the claimant.

Adam Speker (instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP) for the defendant.

The claimant brought an action in libel against the defendant newspaper group in respect of a number of articles accusing him of dishonesty. Various interlocutory matters were heard before Sharp J. The claimant applied for relief in the following terms: “An Order requiring the defendant to disclose to the claimant the number of matters that they instructed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll