header-logo header-logo

Consumer credit—Fixed sum credit agreement—Prescribed terms

15 July 2010
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Southern Pacific Securities 05-2 plc v Walker and another [2010] UKSC 32

Southern Pacific Securities 05-2 plc v Walker and another [2010] UKSC 32
Supreme Court, 7 July 2010, Lord Hope (president), Lord Walker, Lord Brown, Lord Mance and Lord Clarke.

A broker administration fee may form part of the “total cost of the credit” for the purposes of s 9(4) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974), separate from the loan itself, even if the consumer is lent the fee at a rate of interest by the lender at the same rate as the loan.

Richard Mawrey QC, Adrian Salter and Matthew Richardson (instructed by Turner Coulston) for the appellants. Nicholas Elliott QC and William Edwards (instructed by Rosling King LLP) for the respondent.

The borrowers obtained a loan of £17,500 from the lender’s predecessor in title. The parties signed a credit agreement which, it was common ground, was regulated by CCA 1974. The agreement included a “Broker Administration Fee” advanced to the borrowers of £875. Interest was payable on the fee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll