header-logo header-logo

22 July 2010
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Costs—Assessment—Estimate of costs

Rowles-Davies and others v Call 24-7 Ltd [2010] EWHC 1695 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 96 (Jul).

Bernard Livesey QC sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court,
7 July 2010.

The Chancery Division of the High Court ruled on the issue of costs following a previous judgment on the substantive issues between the parties in respect of the construction of a term in a contract for the provision of solicitor audit services by a company owned by the first claimant to the defendant company.

James Couser (instructed by Stephenson Harwood) for the claimants. Iain Pester (instructed by Nexus, Manchester ) for the defendant.

The proceedings concerned costs awards following judgment in the substantive action, which was handed down in June 2010 (see [2010] All ER (D) 121 (Jun). The claimants submitted, inter alia, that the unsuccessful party should be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party pursuant to CPR 44.3(2)(a) and that the court should have regard to the conduct of the defendant. On those grounds the claimants’ costs should be assessed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll