header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
05 August 2010
Issue: 7429 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Constitutional law—Supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court—Upper Tribunal

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

R (on the application of Cart) v The Upper Tribunal and others [2010] EWCA Civ 859, All ER (D) 246 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sedley, Richards LJJ and Sir Scott Baker, 23 July 2010

Decisions of the Upper Tribunal are amenable to judicial review by the High Court, on the model in R (Sivasubramaniam) v Wandsworth County Court [2003] 1 WLR 475.

Richard Drabble QC and Charles Banner (instructed by David Burrows) for the appellant. James Eadie QC and Sam Grodzinski (instructed by Treasury Solicitor) for the first and second interested parties Michael Fordham QC and Tim Buley (instructed by the Public Law Project) for the Intervener, the Public Law Project, by written submissions.

By the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (TCE 2007) a single structure was created within which a huge variety of existing tribunals was gathered. Section 3 provided that the Upper Tribunal was to be a superior court of record. Section 25 gave the tribunal in the discharge of its adjudicative functions “the same

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Sanctions ruling casts ‘wide net’ over global finance
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
NLJ this week: England’s courts cement status as fraud battleground
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
NLJ this week: Mazur ruling puts firms on supervision alert
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
NLJ this week: Landlords’ forced entry powers spark legal divide
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
NLJ this week: Push to scrap ‘vague’ public office misconduct law
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll