header-logo header-logo

Parliamentary privilege—MPs’ expenses—Whether expense claims subject to Parliamentary privilege

12 August 2010
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

R v Chaytor and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1910, [2010] All ER (D) 335 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, Lord Judge CJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Sir Anthony May P,. 30 July 2010

Parliamentary privilege or immunity from criminal prosecution has never attached to ordinary criminal activities by members of Parliament, and does not preclude prosecution for any criminal offences committed with regard to the Parliamentary allowances or expenses scheme.

Lord Pannick QC, L Mably, Mr J Segan and H Laws for the Crown, Nigel Pleming QC and J Knowles for David Chaytor,  E. Fitzgerald QC and J Middleton for Elliot Morley. Gavin Millar QC and R Trowler for James Devine. A Jones QC and R Bowers for Lord Hanningfield.

The four defendants were all charged with allegations of false accounting contrary to s 17(1)(b) of the Theft Act 1968, in relation to their claims for expenses as members of Parliament. An essential ingredient common to all is that the actions involved dishonesty. Three of the defendants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll