header-logo header-logo

12 August 2010
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Parliamentary privilege—MPs’ expenses—Whether expense claims subject to Parliamentary privilege

R v Chaytor and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1910, [2010] All ER (D) 335 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, Lord Judge CJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Sir Anthony May P,. 30 July 2010

Parliamentary privilege or immunity from criminal prosecution has never attached to ordinary criminal activities by members of Parliament, and does not preclude prosecution for any criminal offences committed with regard to the Parliamentary allowances or expenses scheme.

Lord Pannick QC, L Mably, Mr J Segan and H Laws for the Crown, Nigel Pleming QC and J Knowles for David Chaytor,  E. Fitzgerald QC and J Middleton for Elliot Morley. Gavin Millar QC and R Trowler for James Devine. A Jones QC and R Bowers for Lord Hanningfield.

The four defendants were all charged with allegations of false accounting contrary to s 17(1)(b) of the Theft Act 1968, in relation to their claims for expenses as members of Parliament. An essential ingredient common to all is that the actions involved dishonesty. Three of the defendants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll