header-logo header-logo

Company—Shares—Purchase of shares with financial assistance of company

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

AMG Global Nominees (Private) Ltd v Africa Resources Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1262, [2008] All ER (D) 198 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division Sir Andrew Morritt C, Hooper and Wilson LJJ 20 Nov 2008
 

The Court of Appeal has given guidance on when the giving of financial assistance by a subsidiary company to its parent for the acquisition of shares might involve unlawful conduct on the part of the parent, if the acts of the subsidiary are in breach of s 151 of the Companies Act 1985 (CA 1985).
 

David Oliver QC and Ben Shaw (instructed by Reed Smith Richards Butler LLP) for AMG. Francis Tregear QC and Arshad Ghaffer (instructed by Magwells) for ARL.

In proceedings concerning share transactions relating to Zimbabwean subsidiaries of English companies, the issue arose as to whether or not there had been any financial assistance from the subsidiaries to the parent companies in the purchase of shares.

The claimant, AMG, submitted that the approval or instigation of the parent company of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll