header-logo header-logo

Education—Pupil—Religious discrimination

03 July 2009
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of E) v Governing Body of the Jews Free School and others (The United Synagogue intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 626, [2009] All ER (D) 260 (Jun)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sedley, Smith and Rimer LJJ,
25 Jun 2009

The requirement that if a pupil is to qualify for admission to a school his mother has to be Jewish, whether by descent or by conversion, is a test of ethnicity which contravenes the Race Relations Act 1976 (RRA 1976)
Dinah Rose QC and Helen Mountfield (instructed by Bindman & Partners) for E. Peter Oldham (instructed by Stone King LLP) for the Governing Body of JFS and the Admissions Panel of JFS. Tom Lindon QC and Mr Dan Squires (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the secretary of state. Clive Lewis QC (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Schools’ Adjudicator and the Admissions Panel of JFS. Lord Pannick QC and Ben Jaffey (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the United Synagogue.  The remaining interested parties did not appear and were not represented. David Wolfe

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll