header-logo header-logo

Education—Pupil—Religious discrimination

03 July 2009
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of E) v Governing Body of the Jews Free School and others (The United Synagogue intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 626, [2009] All ER (D) 260 (Jun)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sedley, Smith and Rimer LJJ,
25 Jun 2009

The requirement that if a pupil is to qualify for admission to a school his mother has to be Jewish, whether by descent or by conversion, is a test of ethnicity which contravenes the Race Relations Act 1976 (RRA 1976)
Dinah Rose QC and Helen Mountfield (instructed by Bindman & Partners) for E. Peter Oldham (instructed by Stone King LLP) for the Governing Body of JFS and the Admissions Panel of JFS. Tom Lindon QC and Mr Dan Squires (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the secretary of state. Clive Lewis QC (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Schools’ Adjudicator and the Admissions Panel of JFS. Lord Pannick QC and Ben Jaffey (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the United Synagogue.  The remaining interested parties did not appear and were not represented. David Wolfe (instructed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll