header-logo header-logo

03 July 2009
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Education—Pupil—Religious discrimination

R (on the application of E) v Governing Body of the Jews Free School and others (The United Synagogue intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 626, [2009] All ER (D) 260 (Jun)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sedley, Smith and Rimer LJJ,
25 Jun 2009

The requirement that if a pupil is to qualify for admission to a school his mother has to be Jewish, whether by descent or by conversion, is a test of ethnicity which contravenes the Race Relations Act 1976 (RRA 1976)
Dinah Rose QC and Helen Mountfield (instructed by Bindman & Partners) for E. Peter Oldham (instructed by Stone King LLP) for the Governing Body of JFS and the Admissions Panel of JFS. Tom Lindon QC and Mr Dan Squires (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the secretary of state. Clive Lewis QC (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Schools’ Adjudicator and the Admissions Panel of JFS. Lord Pannick QC and Ben Jaffey (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the United Synagogue.  The remaining interested parties did not appear and were not represented. David Wolfe

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime specialist joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll