header-logo header-logo

03 July 2009
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Arbitration—Requirement for Ismaili arbitrator—Whether arbitration clause unlawful

Jivraj v Hashwani Hashwani v Jivraj [2009] EWHC 1364 (Comm), [2009] All ER (D) 272 (Jun)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, David Steel J,
26 June 2009

The Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) (Amendment) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2828) (EER 2003) are not applicable to the selection, engagement or appointment of arbitrators.

Rhodri Davies QC and Schona Jolly (instructed by Hill Dickinson) for J. Stephen Nathan QC and Tom Hickman (instructed by Zaiwalla & Co) for H.
J and H were members of the Ismaili community which formed part of the Shia branch of Islam.

In 1981, they established a joint venture to make investments in real estate. Clause 8 of one of the joint venture agreements provided any arbitrators appointed pursuant to the agreement should be “respected members of the Ismaili community”. J and H parted company in 1988. Several issues were resolved by arbitration, but a dispute eventually arose about the appointment of one arbitrator, C, whom H wished to appoint. J sought a declaration that C’s appointment was invalid since he

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime specialist joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll