header-logo header-logo

Arbitration—Requirement for Ismaili arbitrator—Whether arbitration clause unlawful

03 July 2009
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Jivraj v Hashwani Hashwani v Jivraj [2009] EWHC 1364 (Comm), [2009] All ER (D) 272 (Jun)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, David Steel J,
26 June 2009

The Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) (Amendment) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2828) (EER 2003) are not applicable to the selection, engagement or appointment of arbitrators.

Rhodri Davies QC and Schona Jolly (instructed by Hill Dickinson) for J. Stephen Nathan QC and Tom Hickman (instructed by Zaiwalla & Co) for H.
J and H were members of the Ismaili community which formed part of the Shia branch of Islam.

In 1981, they established a joint venture to make investments in real estate. Clause 8 of one of the joint venture agreements provided any arbitrators appointed pursuant to the agreement should be “respected members of the Ismaili community”. J and H parted company in 1988. Several issues were resolved by arbitration, but a dispute eventually arose about the appointment of one arbitrator, C, whom H wished to appoint. J sought a declaration that C’s appointment was invalid since he was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll