header-logo header-logo

Arbitration—Requirement for Ismaili arbitrator—Whether arbitration clause unlawful

03 July 2009
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Jivraj v Hashwani Hashwani v Jivraj [2009] EWHC 1364 (Comm), [2009] All ER (D) 272 (Jun)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, David Steel J,
26 June 2009

The Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) (Amendment) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2828) (EER 2003) are not applicable to the selection, engagement or appointment of arbitrators.

Rhodri Davies QC and Schona Jolly (instructed by Hill Dickinson) for J. Stephen Nathan QC and Tom Hickman (instructed by Zaiwalla & Co) for H.
J and H were members of the Ismaili community which formed part of the Shia branch of Islam.

In 1981, they established a joint venture to make investments in real estate. Clause 8 of one of the joint venture agreements provided any arbitrators appointed pursuant to the agreement should be “respected members of the Ismaili community”. J and H parted company in 1988. Several issues were resolved by arbitration, but a dispute eventually arose about the appointment of one arbitrator, C, whom H wished to appoint. J sought a declaration that C’s appointment was invalid since he was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll