header-logo header-logo

Arbitration—Requirement for Ismaili arbitrator—Whether arbitration clause unlawful

03 July 2009
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Jivraj v Hashwani Hashwani v Jivraj [2009] EWHC 1364 (Comm), [2009] All ER (D) 272 (Jun)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, David Steel J,
26 June 2009

The Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) (Amendment) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2828) (EER 2003) are not applicable to the selection, engagement or appointment of arbitrators.

Rhodri Davies QC and Schona Jolly (instructed by Hill Dickinson) for J. Stephen Nathan QC and Tom Hickman (instructed by Zaiwalla & Co) for H.
J and H were members of the Ismaili community which formed part of the Shia branch of Islam.

In 1981, they established a joint venture to make investments in real estate. Clause 8 of one of the joint venture agreements provided any arbitrators appointed pursuant to the agreement should be “respected members of the Ismaili community”. J and H parted company in 1988. Several issues were resolved by arbitration, but a dispute eventually arose about the appointment of one arbitrator, C, whom H wished to appoint. J sought a declaration that C’s appointment was invalid since he was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll