header-logo header-logo

01 January 2009
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Law reports: Negligence-Duty to take care-Existence of duty

Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd (2008) EWCA Civ 1427, (2008) ALL ER (D) 155 (Dec); Sir Anthony May P, Lloyd and Etherton LJJ, 16 December 2008

The claimant was a compulsive gambler. In May 2006, he started telephone betting with the defendant. In 2004, the defendant had formulated its own codes of practice for dealing with problem gamblers.

One approach was to offer a problem gambler a form of self-exclusion agreement. In June 2006, the claimant asked the defendant to exclude him from telephone gambling for six months as he was suffering from serious gambling problems. The defendant agreed, but failed to implement its policy successfully, and permitted the claimant to continue gambling.

During the six months from June 2006, the claimant suff ered financial ruin and a deterioration in his gambling disorder. He issued proceedings contending, that the defendant had negligently failed to implement its own policy, in breach of the duty of care it had assumed towards him.

The judge found that the defendant had assumed responsibility to implement its policy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll