header-logo header-logo

Law Update

31 January 2008
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Profession , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Holiday Blues, Expert Appointments, Drug Problem

HOLIDAY BLUES

Statutory holiday entitlement accrued during sick leave can be taken as paid annual leave, according to an opinion by the advocate general. However, if the worker wishes to take the holiday he must return to work to do so. The opinion on the case HMRC v Stringer and others also states that workers should be paid in lieu of the annual leave they have accrued during their sick leave, when their employment is terminated. Deborah Hely, employment partner at Beachcroft, says: “This initial opinion is of particular interest to employers because workers on long term sickness absence may never be in a position to take their paid statutory holiday entitlement thus reducing the annual leave bill.”

 

EXPERT APPOINTMENTS

The binding effect of an expert’s determination depends on the terms of the contract under which he was appointed, the Court of Appeal has declared. In Homepace Ltd v Sita South East Limited the court ruled that if an expert’s determination does not lie within the scope of his authority as laid out in the contract, it has no effect as between the parties. Guy Pendell, a partner at CMSD Cameron McKenna, says: “To avoid challenge, an expert should closely comply with the exact terms of the clause under which he was appointed.”

 

DRUG PROBLEM

An ex-addict from Canada has successfully sued her dealer for selling her the crystal methamphetamine that nearly killed her. Sandra Bergen won her case against former nursery-school pal, Clinton Davey, who sold her the drug which brought on a heart attack, leaving her in a coma for 11 days. The ground-breaking case means that drug dealers now face the threat of legal proceedings from people who can easily recognise them, as well as criminal prosecution from police. The court entered a default judgment against Davey after he refused to name the “John Doe” supplier Bergen also named as a defendant in the case.

Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Profession , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll