header-logo header-logo

The laws of comedy

23 October 2015 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7673_backpage

Copyright is no laughing matter for an aggrieved comic, says Athelstane Aamodt

Recently, Twitter has started to bow to complaints from users that others on the social network have been lifting jokes and passing them off as their own. Claims of joke theft are nothing new of course. Robin Williams, Keith Chegwin, Carlos Mencia and Denis Leary have all had allegations of plagiarism levelled at them during their careers. The comedian Josh Ostrovsky, who calls himself “The Fat Jew”, has long been accused by other comedians of stealing people’s material, prompting one person to compile a list of the top 50 jokes that Mr Ostrovsky is alleged to have stolen.

Joke theft makes comedians extremely angry; jokes are how they make their living. What then would be the potential legal avenue available to an aggrieved comic?

What is a joke?

Jokes are written and designed to be performed, and for that reason they can be most accurately described as dramatic works (the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, s 3). However, the nature of jokes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll