header-logo header-logo

14 July 2023 / Dr Charanjit Singh
Issue: 8033 / Categories: Features , Profession , Cyber , Technology , Legal services , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Lawtech: fit for the future?

130122
Could advances in lawtech provide a much-needed silver bullet for the UK’s ailing criminal justice system? Dr Charanjit Singh weighs up the opportunities & challenges
  • Examines advents in artificial intelligence (AI) and lawtech that could provide solutions for the heavily overburdened criminal justice system.
  • Explores the implications including issues of discrimination and bias, safeguarding and mitigation, and legislative compliance.
  • Notes the current position in relation to AI in criminal and civil justice in the UK.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has had a profound impact on the worlds of banking, health and charitable fundraising. AI systems have the ability to independently perform and outthink their human counterparts; they develop ‘intelligence’ (simulating human intelligence) through experiences and by processing deep layers of information, and they are able to learn, resulting in astounding improvements in the completion of tasks that are complex, technical, and time-consuming. AI can deal with granular detail, identifying people, objects, voices, patterns, and screening for problems.

Lawtech is defined in this article as ‘the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll