header-logo header-logo

08 August 2019
Issue: 7852 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Lawyers brace for no deal

The legal sector could suffer a ‘significant’ slowdown in the event of no deal Brexit, the Law Society has warned.

The UK is currently Europe’s biggest international provider of legal services, and the second biggest in the world. However, a Law Society report published last week, ‘UK-EU future partnership―legal services sector’, predicts a less successful future if no deal goes ahead. The report includes case studies illustrating the extra costs, bureaucracy and legal obstacles for UK law firms advising clients with interests in the EU post-Brexit under no deal.

Law Society President Simon Davis warned: ‘According to our estimates, the volume of work in legal services would be down £3.5bn―nearly 10% lower than under an orderly Brexit.

‘Our sector contributed £27.9bn to the UK in 2018―1.4% of GDP―and in 2017 posted a trade surplus of £4.4bn, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Much of this balance of payments surplus is down to access provided by EU Lawyers’ Directives.’

Under our current arrangement, solicitors can advise clients across the EU on matters relating to all types of law, including EU law and the law of the host state, have their qualifications recognised, can employ or be employed by local lawyers in a different member state and form partnerships with lawyers from other member states, set up an office in another member state, have all communications with EU clients protected by legal professional privilege, and represent clients in courts across the EU.

Davis called on the government to negotiate an agreement that replicates the Lawyers’ Directives, enabling solicitors to maintain their right to practise in the EU. He said precedents for such an agreement existed, for example, the EU has association agreements through the EEA with Norway, Liechtenstein and Iceland and with Switzerland.

Legal and accounting activities contributed an estimated £19.1bn in tax to the Treasury last year.

Issue: 7852 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll