header-logo header-logo

05 November 2014
Issue: 7629 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers downplay holiday pay ruling

Government taskforce to assess the possible impact of decision

The Bear Scotland ruling on voluntary overtime may not be as bad as employers fear, lawyers have said.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that employers must include voluntary overtime when calculating statutory holiday pay for their workers, in Bear Scotland v Fulton UKEAT/0161/14/SM. Employers raised concerns at the prospect of a hefty and potentially backdated bill that they had not budgeted for, with some fearing it could stymie expansion plans.

Donna Martin, employment solicitor at Mackrell Turner Garrett, says it has been “estimated that approximately 5 million workers in the UK could be entitled to more holiday pay at a potential cost to companies of billions of pounds” as a result of the ruling.

However, Jessica Corsi, partner at Doyle Clayton, says: “The impact will be nowhere near as serious as many feared, due to the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s (EAT) ruling on how far back claims can go.   

“The EAT ruled that once there has been a gap of three months between deductions, workers will not be able to bring a claim in respect of earlier deductions. This puts severe limitations on how far back claims can go. For example, if a worker took holiday in January this year, then a further period in April and then took no further holiday until August, the only claim he can bring now will be that he was not paid correctly for the August holiday. 

“This is likely to put to bed concerns for most employers that they could be facing claims going back to 1998 when the Working Time Regulations came into force, or the start of employment if later.”

She adds that permission has been granted for an appeal so “the question of how far back claims can go is still up for grabs”.

Before this case, employers had to include compulsory overtime only when calculating holiday pay.

Udara Ranasinghe, partner at DAC Beachcroft, says: “Employers who have not already received significant demands for payment or substantial legal claims should quickly brace themselves to do so.”

Business secretary Vince Cable is setting up a taskforce of government departments and business representative groups “as a matter of urgency” to assess the possible impact of the ruling.

Issue: 7629 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll