header-logo header-logo

28 June 2017
Issue: 7752 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers hit out at flaws in PM’s plans for EU nationals

Lawyers have hit out at flaws in the Prime Minister’s immigration status pledge to EU nationals.

Prime Minister Theresa May has said EU citizens who arrived in the UK before the Article 50 trigger date of 29 March 2017 will be given similar rights to UK citizens. Those arriving after that date can stay for two years then apply for a work permit.

However, Nick Rollason, immigration law partner at Kingsley Napley, said the proposal would anger many EU nationals, and created uncertainty. ‘Since the referendum, over 100,000 EU nationals and their family members have applied for, and obtained, EU Permanent Residence status,’ he said.

‘Making them re-apply is a waste, not only of their time and money, but also of UK public funds and of Home Office resources.’

The Bar Council, which published the third edition of its Brexit Papers last week, warned the European Court of Justice (CJEU) could be ‘a major stumbling block in negotiations’.

Hugh Mercer QC, chairman of the Bar’s Brexit Working Group, said: ‘Apart from agreeing the categories of citizens who have acquired these rights, the big question around these “acquired rights” is; how will UK and EU citizens enforce the terms of that deal if they run in to difficulties with national authorities, or if the UK and other states disagree over the operation of the new rules?

‘The answer may be to create a mechanism for obtaining an Advisory Opinion in disputes before UK courts or for UK courts to have due regard to CJEU rulings, and an obligation of consistent interpretation to ensure equality, legal certainty and the maintenance of the quality of the rights.’

 

Issue: 7752 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll