header-logo header-logo

28 June 2017
Issue: 7752 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers hit out at flaws in PM’s plans for EU nationals

Lawyers have hit out at flaws in the Prime Minister’s immigration status pledge to EU nationals.

Prime Minister Theresa May has said EU citizens who arrived in the UK before the Article 50 trigger date of 29 March 2017 will be given similar rights to UK citizens. Those arriving after that date can stay for two years then apply for a work permit.

However, Nick Rollason, immigration law partner at Kingsley Napley, said the proposal would anger many EU nationals, and created uncertainty. ‘Since the referendum, over 100,000 EU nationals and their family members have applied for, and obtained, EU Permanent Residence status,’ he said.

‘Making them re-apply is a waste, not only of their time and money, but also of UK public funds and of Home Office resources.’

The Bar Council, which published the third edition of its Brexit Papers last week, warned the European Court of Justice (CJEU) could be ‘a major stumbling block in negotiations’.

Hugh Mercer QC, chairman of the Bar’s Brexit Working Group, said: ‘Apart from agreeing the categories of citizens who have acquired these rights, the big question around these “acquired rights” is; how will UK and EU citizens enforce the terms of that deal if they run in to difficulties with national authorities, or if the UK and other states disagree over the operation of the new rules?

‘The answer may be to create a mechanism for obtaining an Advisory Opinion in disputes before UK courts or for UK courts to have due regard to CJEU rulings, and an obligation of consistent interpretation to ensure equality, legal certainty and the maintenance of the quality of the rights.’

 

Issue: 7752 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

London tech and comms team boosted by telecoms and regulatory hires

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll