header-logo header-logo

Lawyers outraged over suppressed legal aid report

16 March 2007
Issue: 7264 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

The government has been attacked by lawyers across the board for trying to suppress a report that criticises the swingeing reforms planned for legal aid.

The Otterburn report into the Lord Carter’s proposals for overhauling legal aid urges the government to slow the pace of reform because of the risk that high street solicitors may be severely damaged along with access to justice.

The Legal Services Commission (LSC) released the report, The Impact on the Supplier Base of Reductions in Criminal Fees from April 2007, this week after the Lord Chancellor was challenged by the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee in February. Falconer apologised for the delay but the report was still withheld for a further two weeks.

Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association chair, Ian Kelcey, says: “It is an utter disgrace that the LSC have suppressed it until now while it moves on apace with its proposals which Otterburn is critical of…this will ensure the LSC is totally distrusted by the profession. If the LSC proceeds with the current proposals at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll