header-logo header-logo

16 March 2007
Issue: 7264 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Lawyers outraged over suppressed legal aid report

The government has been attacked by lawyers across the board for trying to suppress a report that criticises the swingeing reforms planned for legal aid.

The Otterburn report into the Lord Carter’s proposals for overhauling legal aid urges the government to slow the pace of reform because of the risk that high street solicitors may be severely damaged along with access to justice.

The Legal Services Commission (LSC) released the report, The Impact on the Supplier Base of Reductions in Criminal Fees from April 2007, this week after the Lord Chancellor was challenged by the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee in February. Falconer apologised for the delay but the report was still withheld for a further two weeks.

Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association chair, Ian Kelcey, says: “It is an utter disgrace that the LSC have suppressed it until now while it moves on apace with its proposals which Otterburn is critical of…this will ensure the LSC is totally distrusted by the profession. If the LSC proceeds with the current proposals at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll