header-logo header-logo

Lawyers outraged over suppressed legal aid report

16 March 2007
Issue: 7264 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

The government has been attacked by lawyers across the board for trying to suppress a report that criticises the swingeing reforms planned for legal aid.

The Otterburn report into the Lord Carter’s proposals for overhauling legal aid urges the government to slow the pace of reform because of the risk that high street solicitors may be severely damaged along with access to justice.

The Legal Services Commission (LSC) released the report, The Impact on the Supplier Base of Reductions in Criminal Fees from April 2007, this week after the Lord Chancellor was challenged by the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee in February. Falconer apologised for the delay but the report was still withheld for a further two weeks.

Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association chair, Ian Kelcey, says: “It is an utter disgrace that the LSC have suppressed it until now while it moves on apace with its proposals which Otterburn is critical of…this will ensure the LSC is totally distrusted by the profession. If the LSC proceeds with the current proposals at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll