header-logo header-logo

Lawyers predict European drive on insurance claims

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Innocuous claims could have potential to cost MIB dear

A Court of Appeal decision may have far reaching consequences for the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) after it was ruled that the victims of uninsured drivers may be able to rely on a European Directive for claims.

In McCall v Poulton and Motor Insurers’ Bureau and ors [2008] All ER (D) 212 (Nov) the Court of Appeal upheld a decision of the county court to refer questions to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the obligations of the MIB to compensate the victims of uninsured drivers.

Nicholas Bevan, personal injury specialist at Bond Pearce, says that what began as a fairly innocuous claim has the potential to cost MIB dear.

“Lord Justice Waller has remitted the following questions to the ECJ: first, whether the Marleasing principles applied to the interpretation of the Uninsured Drivers Agreement with the effect that they should be construed in such a way that gives full effect to the Motor Insurance Directives, and second, whether the bureau

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll