header-logo header-logo

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Lawyers predict European drive on insurance claims

Innocuous claims could have potential to cost MIB dear

A Court of Appeal decision may have far reaching consequences for the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) after it was ruled that the victims of uninsured drivers may be able to rely on a European Directive for claims.

In McCall v Poulton and Motor Insurers’ Bureau and ors [2008] All ER (D) 212 (Nov) the Court of Appeal upheld a decision of the county court to refer questions to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the obligations of the MIB to compensate the victims of uninsured drivers.

Nicholas Bevan, personal injury specialist at Bond Pearce, says that what began as a fairly innocuous claim has the potential to cost MIB dear.

“Lord Justice Waller has remitted the following questions to the ECJ: first, whether the Marleasing principles applied to the interpretation of the Uninsured Drivers Agreement with the effect that they should be construed in such a way that gives full effect to the Motor Insurance Directives, and second, whether the bureau

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll